Trinicenter.com Trinicenter.com Trinidad and Tobago News
Online Forums
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Trinicenter.com International Forum
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
And the number of weapons found? 0 (Read 779 times)
News
Newbies
*
Offline


Trinicenter

Posts: 32
And the number of weapons found? 0
Oct 3rd, 2003 at 10:12am
 
1,200 weapons inspectors spent 90 days in Iraq. The exercise cost $300m. And the number of weapons found? 0

By Rupert Cornwell in Washington and Paul Waugh
03 October news.independent.co.uk


Five months after the end of the war in Iraq, a CIA adviser has admitted that his 1,200-strong team of inspectors has discovered none of Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction.

"We have not yet found stocks of weapons," David Kay, the head of the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, said in a first report to closed-door sessions of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, 90 days after the arrival of his group in Iraq. Mr Kay insisted that lines of inquiry on which the group were working might yet yield concrete proof. He hoped to "draw a line" under his work in six to nine months. In the report he argued that the bulkiest material that inspectors were searching for could be hidden in spaces little larger than a two-car garage. "We are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapon stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone".

He said: "Much evidence is irretrievably lost." He also blamed the slow progress on the way Iraq had arranged its WMD activities, the widespread destruction of materials and documents before the war, and looting of suspect sites afterwards.

But the meagre results seem bound to reinforce contentions that the US and British governments, wilfully or by error, grossly exaggerated the scale and the imminence of any threat from Saddam.

Mr Kay could do no better than draw three broad conclusions from his endeavours.

First, he reported the deposed Iraqi leader had "not given up his intentions and aspirations of continuing to acquire WMD" and resuming programmes once sanctions were lifted.

Second, had the Allies not invaded in March, the regime would have continued to develop missiles with a range of up to 1,000km (630 miles), considerably more than the 150km permitted by the UN.

Finally, the report states there were, at minimum, secret research and development activities for chemical and biological weapons, under the umbrella of the Iraqi intelligence services. Those would have left Saddam with a trained corps of specialists, capable of moving swiftly ahead once circumstances permitted. But the evidence unearthed thus far, on the basis of what Mr Kay told Congress yesterday, does not start to measure up to the apocalyptic warnings brandished by George Bush and Mr Blair before the conflict.

On nuclear weapons, Mr Kay is equally downbeat. The team had found no evidence Saddam took any significant steps to build weapons or produce fissile materials after 1998 - when UN weapons inspectors left the country for the last time before their brief return in the three months before war began on 20 March.

The survey group, the report noted, had discovered documents showing dialogue between Iraq and North Korea from 1999, including a meeting in 2000 in Baghdad. But at the time of the invasion, these discussions had come to nothing.

Senior critics such as the former foreign secretary Robin Cook said the failure to find any weapons or agents proved that Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, should have been given more time to complete his work.

In Washington, Democrats were furious. "We need to do some serious thinking about the doctrine of pre-emption," Jay Rockefeller, senior Democrat on the Senate panel, said afterwards. "Yes, we have to wait, but I'm distressed at the need for so much more time."

The Bush administration is seeking a further $600m (£360m) to fund the WMD search. According to The New York Times, the request - part of the $87bn of funding Congress is expected to approve - would increase the size of Mr Kay's team to 1,400 and bring spending on the so-far futile exercise to $1bn.

Mr Kay is said to have speculated that Saddam may even have been bluffing, deliberately letting the West suspect he had chemical and biological weapons, to deter an invasion. Some analysts think the Iraqi leader ordered the weapons destroyed after (or even before) the 1991 Gulf War.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=449413
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
World News
Administrator
*****
Offline


Trinicenter

Posts: 313
Gender: male
'There are no shining weapons'
Reply #1 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 2:35pm
 
Survey report draws a blank

Julian Borger in Washington, Richard Norton-Taylor and Ewen MacAskill
Friday October 3, 2003
The Guardian

The man in charge of a £180m ($300m) hunt for Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction last night admitted that no weapon stocks had been found, and that all a three-month search had uncovered was a single vial containing a possible strain of biological agent.

According to a progress report by the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), delivered to the US Congress yesterday by its leader, David Kay, Saddam had taken no steps to revive his nuclear weapons plan since 1998, and had abandoned any large-scale chemical weapons programme more than a decade ago.

Instead his report focused on documentary, circumstantial and informers' evidence which, Mr Kay said, pointed to Saddam's intentions to revive a weapons programme.

The vial contained a strain of a biological agent, botulinum, and was found hidden in the home of an Iraqi scientist. It was not clear when the vial was hidden.

The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, yesterday claimed that the report justified the war, arguing that it contained "incontrovertible evidence" that Saddam was in breach of UN resolutions.

Mr Straw's remarks were echoed yesterday by Tony Blair who stressed in remarks before the report was released, that the ISG had only been actively searching for weapons for two months.

But several weapons experts contacted yesterday argued that while the ISG, like the UN inspectors before them, appear to have uncovered discrepancies, its overall findings appeared to confirm that Iraq did not have an arsenal of banned weapons at the time of the March invasion.

Ministry of Defence sources said: "There are no shining weapons. We found everything, but those weapons." They added: "It is impossible to predict what we will and won't find."

Mr Kay, an American weapons expert and former UN inspector, stressed that his search was not over and that 120 ammunition dumps had yet to be examined. He said he believed more biological weapons might yet be found, and claimed Saddam had also been planning to resume work on chemical and nuclear weapons at the time of the US and British invasion.

President George Bush has called on the Congress to provide a further £360m ($600m) to continue the search.

But Mr Kay's much awaited report was striking for its admissions on what had not been found.

In particular, the ISG appeared to have been convinced - in marked contrast to prewar claims from Washington and London - that Saddam's chemical weapons (CW) and nuclear programme had been disbanded long before the invasion

"Multiple sources with varied access and reliability have told ISG that Iraq did not have a large, on-going, centrally controlled CW programme after 1991," Mr Kay told a congressional intelligence committee.

He said Saddam had also had nuclear ambitions, but he conceded: "To date we have not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook significant post-1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile material."

The ISG appeared to have more success in finding evidence of plans to build long-distance missiles, which were banned under UN rules.

Mr Kay quoted "detainees and cooperative sources" as claiming that in 2000 Saddam had ordered the development of ballistic missiles with ranges of "at least 400km and up to 1,000 km", and that the projects were hidden from UN inspectors when they arrived in late 2002.

The significance of the vial of botulinum reported found is unclear. In the mid-1990s Iraq admitted to the UN that it had made more than 19,000 litres of botulinum, but claimed to have destroyed it.

According to yesterday's report, the vial contained a strain called C. botulinum Okra B. But the UN weapons experts said it was impossible to tell without further information when it had been made and how potent it was. The botulinum B strain is less potent than the A strain.

Joseph Cirincione, an independent weapons expert, said: "They are finding quite a bit of evidence, but it is pointing to conclusions that the White House is reluctant to draw - that there were no large-scale weapons stocks in Iraq, and possibly no stocks at all."

But Mr Straw insisted: "Kay's report confirms how dangerous and deceitful the regime was and how the military action was indeed both justified and essential to remove the dangers."

The government embarked on a huge public relations exercise last night to use the report to counter criticism both among Labour activists at Bournemouth this week and from governments in Europe that it had deliberately lied about Iraq's weapons.

But the failure to find actual weapons is likely to fuel further criticism.

Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: "This report once again puts the government on the defensive, and adds weight to the conclusion that we went to war against Iraq on a flawed prospectus."

Main points of report

· The report said: "We have not yet found stocks of weapons." It added that the inspectors could not say definitively whether weapons of mass destruction (WMD) "existed before the war"

· It said it had discovered dozens of WMD-related activities and significant amounts of equipment concealed from the UN

· The findings included a clandestine network of laboratories within the Iraqi intelligence service suitable for WMD research

· A vial of C. botulinum Okra B was discovered in the home of biological warfare scientist

· The survey group was unable to corroborate the existence of a mobile biological weapons production effort

· No evidence was found to confirm prewar reporting that Iraqi military units were prepared to use chemical weapons against coalition forces

· No evidence was found that Iraq undertook after 1998 to build nuclear weapons, though there was evidence of Saddam's ambition to acquire them

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1055021,00.html
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged